Original, independent, thought leadership
A word cloud of corporate governance related items

What does the FTX debacle have to do with ESG?

According to published accounts, the rapid bankruptcy filing of FTX Trading Ltd., an exchange for trading cryptocurrencies founded in 2020 by Sam Bankman-Fried, and more than 100 related entities, including Alameda Research, could involve some one million individual creditors and estimated debts to its customers and investors, direct and indirect, of about $8 billion¹.  There…

Share This Article:

The Bottom Line:  The FTX Trading Ltd. debacle, like previous implosions due to governance failures and fraud, should give ESG integration skeptics pause for thought.

Summary

According to published accounts, the rapid bankruptcy filing of FTX Trading Ltd., an exchange for trading cryptocurrencies founded in 2020 by Sam Bankman-Fried, and more than 100 related entities, including Alameda Research, could involve some one million individual creditors and estimated debts to its customers and investors, direct and indirect, of about $8 billion¹.  There will be additional fallouts, likely involving other crypto entities, such as exchanges, lenders, and tokens, and beyond, especially on the regulatory front, and a final loss tally may not be known for some time.  Governance failure and potentially fraud appear to be at the core of FTX’s collapse and both the Securities Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission are investigating FTX.  The losses are not only impacting retail but also sophisticated institutional investors.  These include sovereign wealth funds, private equity firms, hedge funds, pension funds, endowments, and family offices, as well as other investment vehicles. Criminal fraud findings complicate the issue, but a high likelihood of exposure to loss could potentially have been red flagged if corporate governance due diligence had been methodically undertaken and the results factored into investment decision making.  While challenging to evaluate, governance issues have played an important role in the evaluation of corporations, financial institutions, public finance organizations and other entities.  The emphasis on governance is not a new development and the link between corporate governance and the performance of companies has been well established.  This has preceded the introduction of ESG integration in investing practices with its principal emphasis on risk mitigation, but in more recent years the importance of governance has been reinforced by the adoption of ESG investing principles that have recently faced headwinds.  The FTX debacle, like previous implosions due to governance failures, should give ESG skeptics pause for thought.

High likelihood of exposure to loss could potentially have been red flagged if methodical governance due diligence had been conducted

In recent years, corporate governance has attracted more and more attention among professionals, academics and officials involved in the economy. Concern for improving and strengthening mechanisms of corporate governance has grown worldwide.  This has been especially so after high profile governance breakdowns impacted firms like Enron Corporation, WorldCom, Parmalat SpA and others or even more recently governance breakdowns at Bear Stearns Companies Inc., Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and others.

According to the CFA Institute², corporate governance is the system of internal controls and procedures by which individual companies are managed. It provides a framework that defines the rights, roles, and responsibilities of various groups—including management, the board, controlling shareowners, and minority or noncontrolling shareowners—within an organization.

At its core, corporate governance is the arrangement of checks, balances, and incentives a company needs to minimize and manage the conflicting interests between insiders and external shareowners and stakeholders. Its purpose is to prevent one group from expropriating the cash flows and assets of one or more other groups and to provide a structure that ensures the long-term viability of the organization.

In general, good corporate governance practices seek to ensure that:

-Board members act in the best interests of shareowners.  In recent years, effective corporate governance practices have been extended to the interests of a broader stakeholder group (e.g., labor groups, society at large); over the long-term, the interests of shareowners and stakeholders converge; 

-The company acts in a lawful and ethical manner in its dealings with all stakeholders and their representatives; 

-All shareowners have a right to participate in the governance of the company and receive fair treatment from the board and management, and all rights of shareowners and other stakeholders are clearly delineated and communicated; 

-The board and its committees are structured to act independently from management and other influential groups, and to act in the best interest of the corporation; 

-Appropriate controls and procedures are in place to cover management’s activities in running the day-to-day operations of the company; and 

-The company’s governance activities, as well as its operating and financial activities, are consistently reported to shareowners, market participants, and stakeholders in a fair, accurate, timely, reliable, relevant, complete, and verifiable manner.

FTX implosion seen as a complete failure of corporate controls and a complete absence of trustworthy financial information

At FTX, none of the above good governance practices were in evidence.  John J. Ray III, now acting as the Chief Executive Officer on behalf of FTX debtors, made the following comment in the FTX Trading Limited Chapter 11 filing: “I have over 40 years of legal and restructuring experience. I have been the Chief Restructuring Officer or Chief Executive Officer in several of the largest corporate failures in history. I have supervised situations involving allegations of criminal activity and malfeasance (Enron). I have supervised situations involving novel financial structures (Enron and Residential Capital) and cross-border asset recovery and maximization (Nortel and Overseas Shipholding). Nearly every situation in which I have been involved has been characterized by defects of some sort in internal controls, regulatory compliance, human resources and systems integrity. Never in my career have I seen such a complete failure of corporate controls and such a complete absence of trustworthy financial information as occurred here. From compromised systems integrity and faulty regulatory oversight abroad, to the concentration of control in the hands of a very small group of inexperienced, unsophisticated and potentially compromised individuals, this situation is unprecedented.”

FTX, reported to be the industry’s third-largest cryptocurrency exchange and valued recently at $32 billion, filed its petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on November 17, 2022.   Organized in various jurisdictions around the world with headquarters in the Bahamas, FTX faced a severe liquidity crisis that necessitated the bankruptcy filing.

Largely unregulated, FTX was organized along a complex array of businesses, including investments and property, that have been grouped into four silos.  These included: (a) FTX US and related entities that operated an exchange for spot trading in digital assets and tokens with about 1 million users.  In addition, through various owned entities, FTX also offered futures, options and swaps contracts on digital assets and other commodities, broker-dealer services, securities clearing, custodial services, video game development and a marketplace for trading non-fungible tokens.  (b) Alameda Research LLC, owned entirely by co-founders Sam Bankman-Fried and Zixiao “Gary” Wang, operated quantitative trading funds specializing in crypto assets employing strategies that included arbitrage, market making, yield farming and trading volatility.  Alameda apparently dipped into FTX’s customer deposits to meet cash needs, thus commingling funds between the two entities that should have been operating at arm-length that could lead to criminal fraud-charges.  (c) Private venture investments management, and (d) Various entities, including FTX.com.  Not available to US investors, FTX.com is a digital asset trading platform and exchange that also holds certain marketplace licenses and registrations in certain non-US jurisdictions. Also offered is an off-exchange portal that enabled users to connect and request quotes for spot digital assets and trade directly. The portal enabled users to lend their digital assets to other users for spot trading and matched users wanting to borrow with those willing to lend.   In addition to ownership by co-founders, only the last two lines of business identified as c and d apparently have third party equity investors.  These would include investment funds, endowments, sovereign wealth funds, families and other entities.

A final tally of realized losses, both direct and indirect, may not be known for some time 

In addition to any losses that will be incurred by individual investors, institutional investors are also impacted and some realized losses have already been disclosed.  These include both direct and indirect investments by sovereign wealth funds, private equity firms, hedge funds, pension funds, endowments, and family offices, as well as other investment vehicles. There may also be additional indirect fallouts involving other crypto entities, such as exchanges, lenders and tokens and a final tally may not be known for some time.  

The following are just a few examples of the losses or exposures to potential losses that have been disclosed or identified to-date:

-The Singapore state-owned Temasek Holdings which has announced that it will write down its entire $275 million investment in FTX.

-SoftBank’s Vision Fund planned to write down its almost $100 million investment in FTX.

-Sequoia Capital, which reportedly owned FTX and FTX.com in its Global Growth Fund III, announced that nearly $214 million it invested in crypto exchange FTX Trading Ltd. is a total loss³.  Indirect investors through Sequoia’s Global Growth Fund III included the Alaska Permanent Fund Corp. that in 2018 committed $200 million to Sequoia’s Global Growth Fund III and the Washington State Investment Board retirement system that approved an allocation of up to $350 million to the same fund⁴.  

-Ontario Teachers invested a total of $75 million in FTX in October 2021, followed by another $20 million invested in January of 2022. The pension plan housed the FTX investment in its Teachers’ Venture Growth platform. 

-Institutional Venture Partners Fund.  Among investors in Institutional Venture Partners fund with exposure to FTX are Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System; City & County of San Francisco Employees’ Retirement System; Maryland State Retirement & Pension System; and Alaska Permanent Fund Corp.

-Lightspeed Venture Partners Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund was invested in Lightspeed Venture Partners, which also had exposure to FTX.

 

Conclusion

The high likelihood of exposure to losses on the part of sophisticated institutional investors, in particular, could have been red flagged if corporate governance due diligence had been methodically undertaken and the results factored into investment decision making.  Governance is a key focal point of ESG integration and the consistent and systematic accounting of relevant and material governance factors in investment decision making has been an important consideration even before the advent of ESG integration investing.  Incorporating governance has little if anything to do with socially responsible investing and everything to do with risk management considerations and taking advantage of investment opportunities after the completion of thorough investment analysis.

¹ FTX US founded in 2000. Assets and liabilities of FTX and related firms have not been verified and while some firms’ financial statements have been audited but on a more limited basis relative to publicly listed companies, there are substantial concerns regarding these. ² The Corporate Governance of Listed Companies, CFA Institute. ³Source:  Pensions & Investments, Institutions weigh exposure to FTX crypto exchange, November 10, 2022. ⁴ Ibid.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
$99.99
PER YEAR

Premium Articles Access Priority Support 1 Fixed Price

Free Trial
30 Day

Access to All Data No Credit Card Required Cancel Any Time

9.99
Monthly

Access to Premium Articles Priority Support Save 25%


Sign up to free newsletters.


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Research

Research and analysis to keep sustainable investors up to-date on a broad range of topics that include trends and developments in sustainable investing and sustainable finance, regulatory updates, performance results and considerations, investing through index funds and actively managed portfolios, asset allocation updates, expenses, ESG ratings and data, company and product news, green, social and sustainable bonds, green bond funds as well as reporting and disclosure practices, to name just a few.

A continuously updated Funds Directory is also available to investors.  This is intended to become a comprehensive listing of sustainable mutual funds, ETFs and other investment products along with a description of their sustainable investing approaches as set out in fund prospectuses and related regulatory filings.

Getting started

Many questions have surfaced in recent years regarding sustainable and ESG investing.  Here, investors and financial intermediaries will find materials that describe the various approaches to sustainable investing and their implementation.  While sustainable investing approaches vary and they have thus far defied universally accepted definitions, many practitioners agree that they fall into the following broad categories:  Values-based investing, investing via exclusions, impact investing, thematic investments and ESG integration.  In conjunction with each of these approaches, investors may also adopt various issuer engagement procedures and proxy voting practices.  That said, sustainable investing approaches will continue to evolve.

In addition to periodic updates regarding sustainable investing and how this form of investing is evolving, investors and financial intermediaries interested in implementing a sustainable investing approach will also find source materials that cover basic investing themes as well as asset allocation tactics.

Inesting ideas

Thoughts and ideas targeting sustainable investing strategies executed through various registered and non-registered sustainable investment funds and products such as mutual funds, Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), Exchange Traded Notes (ETNs), closed-end funds, Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Unit Investment Trusts (UITs). Coverage extends to investment management firms as well as fund groups. 

Independent source for sustainable investment management company research, analysis, opinions and sustainable fund disclosure assessments